<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Groupofminds Arts Marketing + Technology Consultants &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groupofminds.com/category/twitter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groupofminds.com</link>
	<description>Groupofminds assists arts and cultural groups, arts service agencies, and funders with viral arts marketing and new media technology campaigns.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>5 Twitter tips for arts administrators</title>
		<link>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/5-twitter-tips-for-arts-administrators/764</link>
		<comments>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/5-twitter-tips-for-arts-administrators/764#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupofminds.com/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually write from the perspective of helping arts organizations in a promotional aspect, and I wanted to change lanes for a moment and talk about Twitter use by arts administrators as individuals who may be struggling with &#8220;why.&#8221; &#8220;Why do I want to use Twitter?&#8221; &#8220;What&#8217;s the point of knowing what somebody had for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_768" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://groupofminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter_follow.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-768" title="twitter_follow" src="http://groupofminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter_follow.jpg" alt="Only follow folks who post content you're interested in." width="250" height="250" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Only follow folks who post content you&#39;re interested in.</p></div>
<p>I usually write from the perspective of helping arts organizations in a promotional aspect, and I wanted to change lanes for a moment and talk about Twitter use by arts administrators as individuals who may be struggling with &#8220;why.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do I want to use Twitter?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s the point of knowing what somebody had for lunch? I really don&#8217;t care.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I followed everybody and now I can&#8217;t handle all the tweets.&#8221; (Or &#8220;twits,&#8221; perhaps if you&#8217;re referring the the people who tweet stupid things.)</p>
<p>To help answer these questions and more, I&#8217;m going to tell you a bit about how I use Twitter. Now, I&#8217;m coming from the perspective of using Twitter as a professional and artistic resource, not just another place to gab. More on that below.</p>
<h3>1. Use Twitter as a human filter.</h3>
<p>Many of you are I&#8217;m sure aware of Google Alerts, which is a service by Google that will deliver content via email to you, based on the keywords you select. I use Google Alerts to bring me all sorts of information. As an example, Google sends me alerts based on the keyword &#8220;Arts Marketing.&#8221; Most of the time, what is sent to me as something to do with the arts. But sometimes, Google does its best and sends me webpages about &#8220;Martial Arts<a href="http://groupofminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter_follow.jpg"><span id="more-764"></span></a> Marketing&#8221; since it contains the keywords I told it to look for. That&#8217;s a little annoying, and I&#8217;m sure I could enter more information into Google to get it to subtract &#8220;martial&#8221; from any searches, but the point is, Google is programmatic and brings back literal results without any consideration to how valuable it will really be to me. Kung-fu is great, but not in my inbox when I was looking for something else.</p>
<p>My Twitter friends however, are smart. They come across a ton of interesting arts articles each day, they scan them, and then tweet about them on Twitter to spread the word. I do the same. Suddenly, I have a &#8220;human search engine network&#8221; of people that only pass along the really cool arts stuff that is exactly what I am looking for. That saves me time sorting through stuff that doesn&#8217;t matter, and fosters collaboration.</p>
<p>But what if your friends are tweeting things you&#8217;re not interested in? That&#8217;s simple.</p>
<h3>2. Only follow people that post content you&#8217;re interested in.</h3>
<p>The idea that you should follow everybody that follows you on Twitter is just a recipe for information overload. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve seen people with 15000 followers, who are following 15000 people. How can you realistically keep track of the constant updates of 15000 people? It&#8217;s not possible and you shouldn&#8217;t waste your time trying it. I&#8217;ve always thought its a little rude actually &#8212; since I know the person is following 15000 folks, how important are my individual posts to them? Not very. So, follow those people who provide information you&#8217;re interested in most of the time, so that you can really use Twitter as a resource for information.</p>
<h3>3. 90% of your posts should be information that is useful to those that follow you.</h3>
<p>The lunch updates, the random quotes, the posts that don&#8217;t mean anything &#8212; just don&#8217;t post them. People follow other people for useful information, and I ruthlessly unfollow people who don&#8217;t post useful content or who I&#8217;m not personally connected to. On the flip side, I try to make each one of my Twitter posts link to an interesting article, useful website, great statistic or other resource that arts folks will find helpful. Cut the noise &#8212; make your posts helpful, and don&#8217;t follow folks who&#8217;s posts aren&#8217;t helpful to you.</p>
<h3>4. Only use about 120 characters in each post, which leaves room for others to retweet.</h3>
<p>Twitter gives you 140 characters, which I know is short. But for people to be able to pass your tweet on to their networks, they need to be able to &#8220;quote the source&#8221; and mention @groupofminds or @yourname or whatever as the originator of the tweet. If you use all of the available space for your message, there won&#8217;t be room for them to add their footnote. This drastically reduces the viral-marketing aspect of your tweets. Just use the Twitter character counter to tell you when you&#8217;ve used up 120 characters, and leave the rest.</p>
<h3>5. Use a url shortener.</h3>
<p>I&#8217;d like to hug the person who invented url shortners &#8212; you may have heard of one of the most popular: http://tinyurl.com. A url shortener is just that &#8212; it takes a really long url such as:</p>
<p><a href="http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/dear-facebook-want-a-new-revenue-stream-that-will-help-arts-marketing/685">http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/dear-facebook-want-a-new-revenue-stream-that-will-help-arts-marketing/685</a></p>
<p>and makes a shortcut to it that lives permanently on the web, that looks something like:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/n4s7lw">http://tinyurl.com/n4s7lw</a></p>
<p>because a shorter url means fewer characters used in Twitter. Pretty smart eh? There are many url shortening sites; a quick search of Google will reveal a bunch of them.</p>
<p>Twitter can be extremely useful to arts administrators, as a way to keep up with people they respect in the field, and as a source of knowledge about trends in the arts. With these simple rules of the road, you&#8217;ll be able to tame the Twitter information overload beast, and really get to using the system for the elegant communication it was designed to create.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
<p><em>Like this post? Please share it with though who you think would benefit from it via the links below. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/5-twitter-tips-for-arts-administrators/764/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some informal Twitter statistics from five arts organizations</title>
		<link>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/some-informal-twitter-statistics-from-five-arts-organizations/738</link>
		<comments>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/some-informal-twitter-statistics-from-five-arts-organizations/738#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ron Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experimentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupofminds.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, you know about Twitter. You can&#8217;t avoid it &#8212; the mainstream media has picked up the love affair and is spreading the Twitter love far and wide. I recently did a bit of analysis on the Twitter account saturation in the email subscribers a few of our clients, and the results were intriguing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_753" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 260px"><a href="http://groupofminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter2_img.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-753" title="twitter2_img" src="http://groupofminds.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/twitter2_img.jpg" alt="We estimate roughly 10% of your arts audience is playing around with Twitter." width="250" height="250" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">We estimate roughly 10% of your arts audience is playing around with Twitter.</p></div>
<p>By now, you know about Twitter. You can&#8217;t avoid it &#8212; the mainstream media has picked up the love affair and is spreading the Twitter love far and wide. I recently did a bit of analysis on the Twitter account saturation in the email subscribers a few of our clients, and the results were intriguing.</p>
<p>I scanned the email address databases of five of my arts clients, looking for people who were in their email database, who also had a Twitter account. The five arts organizations were a variety of genres and budget sizes from small to large, so it was interesting to see the same statistics across the board.</p>
<h3>Twitter statistics</h3>
<ul>
<li>10% of the email subscribers had a Twitter account associated with their email address.</li>
<li>Roughly 1/2 of those patrons with Twitter accounts had not uploaded a picture to use as their Twitter avatar.</li>
</ul>
<p>I interpret the latter to mean that those people who have not uploaded a picture are still in the &#8220;sampling Twitter&#8221; phase &#8212; just logging in and &#8220;lurking&#8221; around trying to figure it all out. That&#8217;s actually good &#8212; we want our audiences to be playing with the new tools. But I don&#8217;t count these folks as being &#8220;power players&#8221; yet, as they probably won&#8217;t be following a lot of people or participating to any great degree until they decide if they want<span id="more-738"></span> to fully get on the bus, which I measure by the action of them uploading an image of themselves. That action is sort of &#8220;staking a claim&#8221; on your own little corner of Twitter, and letting everybody know you&#8217;re ready to play.</p>
<h3>Twitter use by all arts organizations?</h3>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re ok with making the jump to roughly apply the above data to all arts organizations, Twitter campaigns currently reach about 5% of your existing audiences who are active Twitter users. That&#8217;s pretty low currently, but it&#8217;s growing rapidly, and you should participate and continue to help it grow, as more and more focus is moving towards up-to-the-minute feedback and reviews after a performance for example.  Also, the ability to acquire new Twitter followers through friends of current followers  IS a powerful reason to keep using Twitter, along with the generally younger audience base that comes with Twitter. But it is important to remember that &#8220;recently new&#8221; communication tools like email marketing are still the workhorses of arts marketing, reaching a much higher percentage of your arts patrons, so you definitely don&#8217;t want to slack on the &#8220;tried and true.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the above stats are changing as time marches on. Those 5% that are just experimenting right now may jump on board, and new folks will take their place experimenting. In a year, I expect more than 10% of arts audiences to be &#8220;actively&#8221; using Twitter (with their image uploaded) and a new 10% will be in the experimentation stage. We&#8217;re planning to repeat the same experiment in a year with these five clients, to see how the numbers changed. If you have any stats of your own on Twitter saturation in your arts audiences, please leave a comment and let us know. Also, groupofminds is on Twitter, so if you&#8217;re not currently a follower and would like to see more of the in-the-moment posts, please <a title="Groupofminds on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/groupofminds" target="_blank">follow us</a>.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
<p><em>Did you like this post? Please share it with those it may benefit via the links below!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://groupofminds.com/articles/arts-marketing/some-informal-twitter-statistics-from-five-arts-organizations/738/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
